Re: Potential impact of gettext 0.25 on Fedora mass-rebuild

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 4:17 PM Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
V Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 03:38:02PM +0200, Frederic Berat napsal(a):
> That's the list of packages failing without gettext + autoconf update:
>
> # Mass-prebuild gettext-0.25 (ID:474)
>
> This report was generated using mpb-report 1.6.1.dev0+g08e7359.d20250425
>
> ## General information
>
> Build location: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/fberat/gettext-0.25
> Chroot: fedora-rawhide
> Tested architectures: x86_64
>
> Main packages tested:
>
>     autoconf:
>         Source: (distgit) fedora
>
>     gettext:
>         Source: (distgit) git+https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gettext.git
>         NVR: gettext-0.23.1-2.fc42
>         Commit/branch: 9b44db8d2186b3d52ece9adddc945de27dac580a
>
> ## Overall status
>
>     2505 out of 2505 builds are done.
>     Success: 2345
>     Manual confirmation needed: 96
>     Failed: 64
>
> ## List of failed packages
>
>     GConf2:
>         Source: (distgit) git+https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/GConf2.git
>         NVR: GConf2-3.2.6-44.fc42
>         Commit/branch: a0031f4f3edf3b0f27b593bb33b0b40fec4ef7c0

This is a 6-month old commit. This package was fixed in commit
00ed646063d0f0c1fe63a93c0a04d9d7890fcf5b 2 months ago.

Do you have newer results?

The list was generated through f42 as a proxy to get A/B testing, so yes I expect some of them to be too old.

I'd say, the critical part is actually the second list, packages that still don't build with autoconf and gettext updates. Even though they are gated, we still hope they could be taken into account before the mass-rebuild kicks in.

I'll try to generate a more up to date list, but I can't guarantee it. It implies to build the rawhide versions in an 42 chroot to have the B test building with gettext 0.24. The risk is to hide some failures because you simply can't build their rawhide versions in f42 for whatever reasons.

 

-- Petr

--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux