On Fri, 2025-07-18 at 16:17 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > I don't necessarily disagree withat *that*. But I would strongly object > to Fedora publishing a guideline that says or implies that certain type > of generated code is not copyrightable. We can reach an agreement about > risks without making specific claims about the legal situation. Just to be very clear (hence separate post), I never meant to say that Fedora should make *any* legal claim. It was just my argument that was expressed in order to justify my position, but you do not have to agree with my premise to come to the same conclusion. Either way I do not think Fedora should generally express legal opinion on very much unsettled legal matters. -- Simo Sorce Distinguished Engineer RHEL Crypto Team Red Hat, Inc -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
