Once upon a time, Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: > On Wed, 2025-07-09 at 20:10 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > Chris Murphy writes: > > > > > I'm able to fix this with efibootmgr, but... what a swig of sour milk. > > > > That pretty much describes my kneejerk reaction about a decade ago when I > > first read about secure boot, and how great it is to have each boot stage > > signed by an all-mighty cert. > > Nothing Chris wrote about actually has anything to do with Secure Boot, > really. It's just about how the UEFI boot manager works. Different Chris, but... it sounds like Windows gets a "fallback" position for when the firmware has no boot entries; is there a way to get Fedora into that position instead (in a dual-boot setup)? Or is it a case of the firmware just explicitly looking for the Windows loader? -- Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
