Nikita Popov <npopov@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I haven't looked into this, but I suspect LLVM will want to disable > this due to the size of our libraries. llvm-static is a dependency of > llvm-devel, and it's already close to 400MB when installed. [...] I see what you mean. I've tried to gather this data about llvm on my workstation, but recent rpmbuild's keep barfing with: [...] FAILED: /PATH/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm-20.1.7-build/llvm-project-20.1.7.src/llvm/redhat-linux-build/lib/clang/20/lib/i386-redhat-linux-gnu/libclang_rt.fuzzer_no_main.a [...] /PATH/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm-20.1.7-build/llvm-project-20.1.7.src/llvm/redhat-linux-build/bin/llvm-ar qcs /PATH/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm-20.1.7-build/llvm-project-20.1.7.src/llvm/redhat-linux-build/lib/clang/20/lib/i386-redhat-linux-gnu/libclang_rt.fuzzer_no_main.a fuzzer_no_main.o /usr/bin/ld: relocatable linking with relocations from format elf64-x86-64 (/PATH/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm-20.1.7-build/llvm-project-20.1.7.src/llvm/redhat-linux-build/runtimes/runtimes-bins/compiler-rt/lib/fuzzer/libcxx_fuzzer_i386/lib/libc++.a(cxa_guard.cpp.o)) to format elf32-i386 (fuzzer_no_main.o) is not supported clang++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) [...] I can't tell for sure what's different about my F42 box and koji's F42 builder; the latter succeeds but without any of these 32-bit binaries being built. Maybe glibc-devel.i686 being installed? Trying some more things. - FChE -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
