Hey all,
While packaging the new Automake, I ran into something that got me thinking. A bug (since fixed in 1.18.1) made it try to rebuild the info documentation from its Texinfo sources, which implied a new BuildRequires: texinfo dependency on packages that depend on Automake.
This got me wondering, we build packages from the source, but for some packages, we just ship the pre-generated info files that come in the tarball instead of building them from the .texi source files ourselves.
So, I wanted to get your take on this: Should we make it a standard practice to build info docs from their .texi sources, instead of using the pre-built ones?
Curious to hear your thoughts!
Fred.
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
