Hello, I have recently done a rebase of mysql-connector-python from 8.0.21 to 8.0.33 and among the many changes made in the rebase was the inclusion of a couple of types of buildable documentation (e.g.: html, man pages, e.t.c.). A problem arises when I started looking into the licensing for all the new added code and files. I have found a couple of fonts used in the html documentation sources (which I decided not to package in favour of more traditional man pages). The fonts in question:
1234567891011121314151617fontawesome-webfont.eot fontawesome-webfont.svg fontawesome-webfont.ttf fontawesome-webfont.woff fontawesome-webfont.woff2 lato-bold-italic.woff lato-bold-italic.woff2 lato-bold.woff lato-bold.woff2 lato-normal-italic.woff lato-normal-italic.woff2 lato-normal.woff lato-normal.woff2 Roboto-Slab-Bold.woff Roboto-Slab-Bold.woff2 Roboto-Slab-Regular.woff Roboto-Slab-Regular.woff2
My question is: How to handle referencing the Licenses of the fonts since they are binary files and there does not seem to be any sign of a license mentioned anywhere near them? I do not use these fonts during the build nor do I package them but since the main package is licensed under GPL-2.0-only I have to take the licenses of the source files into consideration.
The worst part probably is the fact that the fontawesome-webfont.svg contains this line:Copyright Dave Gandy 2016. All rights reserved..
Could you please help me understand how to work this out?
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
