On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 01:10:39PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > And I think that's still the right way to do it. Today, glibc32 only > provides what GCC needs to build its -m32 bits, it's not a generally > useful 32-bit development or execution environment. I'd like to correct that, glibc32 (which is still a hack even in current form, sure, the earlier one was uglier; in any case a workaround for lack of multilib support in koji) is something that is sufficient for the x86_64 build of gcc to have its side of 32-bit support, but most of it comes from gcc build in i686 environment right now. In order to build gcc only during the x86_64.rpm build such that it would have all the needed 32-bit libraries (shared and static), we'd need more libraries than what is in glibc32. Jakub -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
