On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 12:26:27PM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Red Hat's enterprise ambitions may not take it near Valve headquarters, but > I do not see why gaming has to be the primary selling point. RHEL 10 removed > i686 but I would not be surprised to see it return once customers attempt to > upgrade. If a RHEL user still needs i686 multilib support, the solution is to continue to use RHEL-9 either on the host, or as a VM, or as a container. RHEL-9 lifetime has a long way to run yet, and by the end of RHEL-9, i686 multi-lib will be even more niche than it already is. Also in terms of precedent, RHEL has been willing to drop support for old HW/SW platforms. Most recently the big example is the requirement for x86_64-v2 ABI in RHEL-9, further bumped to x86_64-v3 ABI in RHEL-10, which likely affected more RHEL users than dropping i686 will. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
