On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 08:04:52AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> said: > > What else would be high profile enough *in Fedora* to merit a > > blocker ? IMHO external apps should not influence our decision, > > and must adapt to what the distro decides to provide. > > This is a big decision IMHO: is Fedora going to be a "closed" ecosystem? > I'm not talking about source code, I mean Fedora only being intended to > run Fedora-provided software. No, this isn't about being a closed platform. It is about defining what should reasonably be considered blockers for Fedora's decisions and what is reasonable to impose as a burden on Fedora maintainers. It is possible to run plenty of non-Fedora software on Fedora just fine today and long into the future, both OSS and proprietary. None the less it is unreasonable to demand that volunteer Fedora maintainers take on extra work & responsibility to keeping arbitrary 3rd party software working indefinitely, especially when it is proprietary software. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
