On Sat, Jun 7, 2025 at 8:45 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 02:52:06PM -0500, maxwell--- via devel-announce wrote:
> > ocaml-odoc defolos, orphan 1 weeks ago
>
> I thought this one might be used by more packages, but I think the
> only dependency chain is ocaml-odoc -> ocaml-sedlex -> haxe.
It isn't even used there. The usage in ocaml-sedlex is conditioned on
"%if %{with docs}" and higher up you'll see "%bcond docs 0".
> I think we removed the dependency from lots of packages in the past.
> For example (taken at random):
That is correct; no Fedora packages depend on ocaml-odoc anymore.
> I'm not sure if odoc is still used somehow implicitly that I'm not
> understanding, or did we just get rid of the documentation?
> (I actually favour the latter, package documentation generated from
> source files like this isn't usually very useful, and adds little
> value over simply looking at the *.mli files.)
Right, we no longer generate documentation for packages that require
ocaml-odoc. We do still generate documentation for a few packages
that use ocaml-ocamldoc to do so.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
