Once upon a time, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxxx> said: > On Tue, Apr 29 2025 at 11:00:18 AM -05:00:00, Chris Adams > <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >I'm asking because there's a high-priority CVE on openh264 for months > >that doesn't seem like it's progressing towards getting resolved in > >Fedora. > > For context on this, see: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/12617 So it's been another month and this still isn't resolved. I know people on the Fedora side have been trying (don't want to complain about effort). But if Fedora can't reliably get timely updates to a package that has high security implications, it should NOT be enabled by default, or even shipped by Fedora at all. -- Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
