While I do appreciate The Council following up on this, consistent communication matters. The way it appears now from this e-mail and Aoife's, all that matters currently is: - "lack of defined process" - "eager to put this behind us" - "This statement is intended to give closure to this issue" Case closed for formal reasons and unwillingness to deal with the past, on all sides! This lack of transparancy and consistency is - frankly speaking - unsatisfying and makes me wonder whether that some reasoning would have been applied to everybody (and not just every's buddy). Yes, I'm being unfair, intentionally so, to make the point where that lack of transparancy leads us to: defnitely not to "closure" in a good sense. Michael -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
