On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 7:15 PM Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Dne 03. 05. 25 v 4:33 odp. Chris Adams napsal(a): > > What do you do with bugs that never get addressed in any way? I've got > > a few bugs that I've been testing and rolling over to newer Fedora > > releases for years, with little or no maintainer response (not even > > bothering to CLOSE WONTFIX). It's still a bug, so I don't like to close > > it... but if nobody else cares, maybe I shouldn't either. > > > > Seems like there needs to be some kind of better process than just > > auto-closing old bugs. If the maintainer doesn't feel like closing > > them, maybe packages should just be orphaned and retired. > > Kernel has 1298 bugs in Fedora BZ. Many of them without comment. Does it make kernel non-functional? Does it mean that > maintainer(s) does not care about the package? Should the package be retired? No. Definitely no. Note that the bugzilla assignee for the "kernel" package seems to be a deactivated bugzilla account, since a few months ago, so it's unclear whether anybody is even getting notifications for bugs filed against the package. Fabio -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
