On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 12:14 PM Marc Deop i Argemí <marcdeop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thursday, 24 April 2025 15:12:42 Central European Summer Time Peter Boy Uni > wrote: > > Interesting. Could you perhaps elaborate on which of our standards > > (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/#_our_standar > > ds) this post violates? > > - Not being kind to the KDE SIG > - Not being respectful to other viewpoints ( KDE SIG and others) > - Not focusing on what is best for the community ( this has already been dealt > with, he and another contributor take every opportunity to bring this topic up > ) > - Bringing controversy _again_ for an already dealt with topic > - Repeatedly instigating conflict, and baiting people into arguments > > While I understand 1 or 2 of the points my be subjective, others are very > clear. > > This thread was about an issue regarding GDM and X11 sessions. There is no > need to bring up the topic of X11 support on KDE Fedora. > > Funnily enough, I agree with the request to bring the X11 Gnome session as > removing it should have been part of a change proposal. > It was already restored as an update to F42: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-36e1759b84 -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
