Re: F43 Change Proposal: Modular GnuPG packaging (self-contained)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Do you have any opinion on which new optional subpackages should or
> should not get pulled in by default on new installs?

I'm not familiar with all the components either. One thing I notice is
that treating keyboxd as optional seems questionable. The manual says
it will be used by default for new users. Have you checked what the
various components will do if it's missing?

I see that gnupg2 requires gnupg2-verify. That will keep package builds
working, so that's good. If that dependency would be dropped or turned
into "Recommends", then we would need to coordinate this change with
the "Fix limitations in gpgverify" change to make changes in the right
order.

Björn Persson

Attachment: pgpXmMrYyDpJ9.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux