On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 08:47:51PM +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote: > Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote on Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 01:18:52PM +0200: > > I wonder where from all those "not owned by any package" files came from. > > This system is about 12 years old (was Fedora 19 at start). > > I have a similar list of files in there, just looked at one at random: > > file /usr/sbin/capsh is not owned by any package > > And it's interesting because rpm has a /bin/capsh, and the content isn't > the same... > ``` > $ xxhsum /bin/capsh /sbin/capsh > 7bffb7abbc827896 /bin/capsh > 2f355e5a40a1321b /sbin/capsh > ``` > > Interestingly my path has sbin after bin (I've been used to it being the > other way around), so the supposedly up to date bin version comes first > and there isn't any weird behaviour thanks to that, but I guess some > update didn't work well at some point... And probably not too long ago: > looking at a snapshot pre-upgrade, fedora 41 had /sbin/capsh and no > /bin/capsh, so it's probably easy enough to reproduce? I _think_ this is caused by some early versions of the upgrade scriptlets which didn't create the symlinks properly in some cases. If this would occur with an upgrade from F41 to the released F42, then that'd be unexpected and certainly something to fix. Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
