On Tue, Apr 15 2025 at 01:19:10 AM +02:00:00, Fabio Valentini
<decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The non-responsive maintainer process requires that the maintainer is
*entirely unresponsive*,
which is a much higher bar than for this proposed, less-consequential
process.
If the maintainer is not unresponsive, why can't you just ask the
maintainer for commit access...?
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
