Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 at 13:21, Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I plan to update libcamera to 0.5.0 in rawhide, which means ABI change. >> The only package affected is pipewire-plugin-libcamera, which must be >> rebuilt against the updated libcamera version. >> > > libcamera-apps is also affected. Ah, right, this is an additional dependent package on aarch64. >> In the coming days, I'm going to create a side tag to build libcamera >> 0.5.0 + pipewire-plugin-libcamera. > > > There is a new dep also for libcamera on aarch64, I have filed a package > review Great, thank you. > and already linked it to the libcamera 0.5 bug, so that will need to > new reviewed and landed before we can rebase to the new version. The commit I prepare builds fine if the newly introduced rpi/pisp pipeline is disabled so 0.5.0 is not blocked by that, we can go with or without libpisp depending on how long it takes to get it in. Regards, Milan -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
