and from rpm:
$ rpm -q --requires rpm | grep core
coreutils
So no, I would not say you need a BR on coreutils, because it's a
requirement for RPM to function.
> Either way, there's probably a need to update pacakges... just looking
> at perl SRPMS in rawhide, there's a big split between packages with a
> BR: coreutils and not. A quick look finds:
>
> - 1726 perl-* packages that BR coreutils
> - 1227 perl-* packages that do NOT BR coreutils but use %{_fixperms)
> - 134 perl-* packages that do NOT BR coreutils, also do NOT use %{_fixperms}
>
> I'd bet the bulk of the 1726 that do BR coreutils are fox %{_fixperms}
> and could drop it, or the 1227 that don't BR coreutils should be updated
> to do so.
>
> I don't know how common %{_fixperms} use is outside of perl packages.
>
> Thoughts?
> --
> Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
--
Elliott
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
