Re: packaging: prefer git archives to upstream archives for Source

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 31 2025 at 08:09:49 PM +00:00:00, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
OK, I guess I need to work on my English. You're the second person who
read the abovequoted part in the exact opposite way to what I intended :(

Hm, well I misread. You didn't write the wrong thing.

But honestly I'm not sure that using an upstream GPG-signed tarball is really more trustworthy than using a forge-generated tarball. The question is: do I trust the upstream forge infrastructure more, or do I trust the computers of the maintainers who have access to the GPG signing key more? I think a compromise of GitHub infrastructure is less likely than a compromise of an individual maintainer, so it really probably does make sense to trust the forge.


--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux