On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 03:12:21PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:32:04 +0100
> "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 08:19:11AM -0400, Jens Petersen wrote:
> > > > > >Some OCaml spec files do the following:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ExclusiveArch: %{ocaml_arches}
> > > > > >
> > > > > >This is always incorrect for several reasons:
> > >
> > > Is %{ocaml_arches} used for anything?
> > >
> > > In case not, maybe better to remove it?
> >
> > I've removed it completely. I'm updating the packages which
> > used this macro.
> >
> > (Unfortunately my original email on this subject is stuck in a
> > moderator queue, so I've attached it here.)
>
> But do you still need to bootstrap ocaml on the non-native arches to
> get the bytecode interpreted one? Or is simply a build? I'm asking
> because s390x as you could guess :-)
Just a straight build should work. If the build fail(s/ed) on s390x
can you point me to that, and I'll take a look.
I'd *really* love someone to write a s390x native backend! That would
complete the set.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
