Fedora Desktop
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: Cure found for kernel updates
- Cure found for kernel updates
- Re: SELinux in Fedora Workstation
- Re: SELinux in Fedora Workstation
- Re: SELinux in Fedora Workstation
- Re: SELinux in Fedora Workstation
- Re: SELinux in Fedora Workstation
- Re: SELinux in Fedora Workstation
- Re: SELinux in Fedora Workstation
- Re: SELinux in Fedora Workstation
- SELinux in Fedora Workstation
- Re: Cure for shrinking terminals found
- Re: Cure for shrinking terminals found
- Cure for shrinking terminals found
- Re: gedit-code-assistance by default in Workstation
- Re: gedit-code-assistance by default in Workstation
- Re: gedit-code-assistance by default in Workstation
- Re: gedit-code-assistance by default in Workstation
- Re: gedit-code-assistance by default in Workstation
- Re: gedit-code-assistance by default in Workstation
- Re: gedit-code-assistance by default in Workstation
- Re: How to try fedora workstation ?
- Re: How to try fedora workstation ?
- Re: How to try fedora workstation ?
- Re: How to try fedora workstation ?
- From: Max Rydahl Andersen
- Re: How to try fedora workstation ?
- How to try fedora workstation ?
- From: Max Rydahl Andersen
- Re: gedit-code-assistance by default in Workstation
- Re: gedit-code-assistance by default in Workstation
- Wayland in rawhide should work again
- Re: gedit-code-assistance by default in Workstation
- gedit-code-assistance by default in Workstation
- Re: Initial WS live image kickstart files
- Re: Initial WS live image kickstart files
- Re: Initial WS live image kickstart files
- Re: Workstation status and TODOs
- Re: Fedora.next: Scope of the Workstation product
- Fedora.next: Scope of the Workstation product
- Re: Gnome 3.12 to Fedora20?
- Re: Gnome 3.12 to Fedora20?
- Re: Gnome 3.12 to Fedora20?
- Re: Gnome 3.12 to Fedora20?
- Re: Gnome 3.12 to Fedora20?
- Re: Gnome 3.12 to Fedora20?
- Re: Gnome 3.12 to Fedora20?
- Re: Gnome 3.12 to Fedora20?
- Re: Gnome 3.12 to Fedora20?
- Re: Gnome 3.12 to Fedora20?
- Re: Gnome 3.12 to Fedora20?
- Gnome 3.12 to Fedora20?
- Re: Desktop and FirewallD
- Re: Desktop and FirewallD
- Re: Desktop and FirewallD
- Re: Workstation status and TODOs
- Re: Workstation status and TODOs
- Re: Workstation status and TODOs
- Re: Desktop and FirewallD
- Re: Workstation status and TODOs
- Re: Workstation status and TODOs
- Re: Workstation status and TODOs
- Re: Desktop and FirewallD
- Desktop and FirewallD
- Re: Workstation status and TODOs
- clarification on "Workstation: Enable Software Collections" change proposal
- Re: Current package list for the Workstation product
- Re: Current package list for the Workstation product
- Initial WS live image kickstart files
- Workstation status and TODOs
- Re: Current package list for the Workstation product
- Re: Current package list for the Workstation product
- Current package list for the Workstation product
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Deliverables and release engineering changes for Fedora.Next
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Default font configuration doesn't look right on Fedora...
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update - brightness problems
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update - brightness problems
- Re: fedora.next workstation "stable"
- Re: fedora.next workstation "stable"
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: fedora.next workstation "stable"
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update - brightness problems
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update - brightness problems
- Re: fedora.next workstation "stable"
- Re: fedora.next workstation "stable"
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update - brightness problems
- Re: External websites and Fedora's Foundations
- Re: External websites and Fedora's Foundations
- Re: External websites and Fedora's Foundations
- External websites and Fedora's Foundations
- Re: F21 changes for the workstation: firewall
- Re: F21 changes for the workstation: firewall
- Re: F21 changes for the workstation: firewall
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: fedora.next workstation "stable"
- fedora.next workstation "stable"
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: F21 changes for the workstation: firewall
- Re: F21 changes for the workstation: firewall
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: F21 changes for the workstation: firewall
- Re: F21 changes for the workstation: firewall
- Re: F21 change for the Workstation: software collections
- F21 change for the Workstation: software collections
- F21 changes for the workstation: firewall
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: how are upgrades supposed to work in fedora.next?
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: how are upgrades supposed to work in fedora.next?
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: GNOME 3.12 copr and getting out of rpm dep hell
- Re: GNOME 3.12 copr and getting out of rpm dep hell
- Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
- Re: GNOME 3.12 copr and getting out of rpm dep hell
- GNOME 3.12 copr and getting out of rpm dep hell
- Reminder: Change Proposals Submission Deadline in one week!
- Re: Rethinking of global menu on Gnome Shell
- Re: Rethinking of global menu on Gnome Shell
- Re: Rethinking of global menu on Gnome Shell
- Re: Rethinking of global menu on Gnome Shell
- Re: Rethinking of global menu on Gnome Shell
- Rethinking of global menu on Gnome Shell
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Introduction, Documenting Workstation
- Re: kde-runtime
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: how are upgrades supposed to work in fedora.next?
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Re: Trying Wayland
- Trying Wayland
- Reminder: Change Proposals Submission Deadline in two weeks
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: unoconv in F20 gained dependency on strange GUI applications
- Re: Fonts in Fedora Workstation
- Flock registration and talk proposals open
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: Fonts in Fedora Workstation
- Re: Fonts in Fedora Workstation
- Re: Fonts in Fedora Workstation
- Re: Fonts in Fedora Workstation
- Re: Fonts in Fedora Workstation
- Re: Fonts in Fedora Workstation
- Fonts in Fedora Workstation
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: qt runtime support
- Re: kde-runtime
- Re: kde-runtime
- Re: kde-runtime
- Re: kde-runtime
- Re: kde-runtime
- Re: kde-runtime
- Re: qt runtime support
- Re: qt runtime support
- Re: kde-runtime
- Re: Polishing the installer
- Re: kde-runtime
- Re: Polishing the installer
- Polishing the installer
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: arm support of workstation product
- Re: how are upgrades supposed to work in fedora.next?
- arm support of workstation product
- how are upgrades supposed to work in fedora.next?
- Re: Gnome 3.12 packages: abrt says "package evince isn't signed with proper key"
- Gnome 3.12 packages: abrt says "package evince isn't signed with proper key"
- Re: unoconv in F20 gained dependency on strange GUI applications
- Re: F21 change proposal
- Re: F21 change proposal
- Re: F21 change proposal
- Re: F21 change proposal
- Re: F21 change proposal
- Re: F21 change proposal
- Workstation User Experience
- F21 change proposal
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: kde-runtime
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: unoconv in F20 gained dependency on strange GUI applications
- Re: unoconv in F20 gained dependency on strange GUI applications
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: unoconv in F20 gained dependency on strange GUI applications
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: unoconv in F20 gained dependency on strange GUI applications
- Re: KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: unoconv in F20 gained dependency on strange GUI applications
- unoconv in F20 gained dependency on strange GUI applications
- KDE integration/status for Workstation
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: default filesystem
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: default filesystem
- Re: vetting the package list
- Re: vetting the package list
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: hw requirements
- Re: hw requirements
- hw requirements
- Re: PRDs/Tech Specs to formal Change Proposals and Change submission deadline
- Re: PRDs/Tech Specs to formal Change Proposals and Change submission deadline
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: PRDs/Tech Specs to formal Change Proposals and Change submission deadline
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: PRDs/Tech Specs to formal Change Proposals and Change submission deadline
- Re: default filesystem
- default filesystem
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- From: Rui Tiago Cação Matos
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: PRDs/Tech Specs to formal Change Proposals and Change submission deadline
- Re: PRDs/Tech Specs to formal Change Proposals and Change submission deadline
- Re: PRDs/Tech Specs to formal Change Proposals and Change submission deadline
- PRDs/Tech Specs to formal Change Proposals and Change submission deadline
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Fedora Board Working Group PRD approval
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- vetting the package list
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21) meeting minutes and logs
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: Tech Spec: Software Updates
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: Tech Spec: Software Updates
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Tech Spec: Software Updates
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: Tech Spec: Software Updates
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: Tech Spec: Software Updates
- Re: Tech Spec: Software Updates
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: Tech Spec: Software Updates
- Re: Tech Spec: Software Updates
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: Tech Spec: Software Updates
- Re: Tech Spec: Software Updates
- Tech Spec: Software Updates
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21) meeting minutes and logs
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Other breakages with 3.12 update: Lifeograph
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21) meeting minutes and logs
- Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21) meeting minutes and logs
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: Testing wayland with packages from the 3.12 COPR repo
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Testing wayland with packages from the 3.12 COPR repo
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21) meeting minutes and logs
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21) meeting minutes and logs
- Re: Tech Spec, System Installer
- Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21) meeting minutes and logs
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21) meeting minutes and logs
- Re: Tech Spec, System Installer
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21) meeting minutes and logs
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21) meeting minutes and logs
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21) meeting minutes and logs
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Filling the gaps in the spec: media
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-02-21) meeting minutes and logs
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: Tech Spec, System Installer
- Re: Tech Spec, System Installer
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: Tech Spec, System Installer
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Technical Spec, better upgrade/rollback control
- Re: Tech Spec, System Installer
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Technical spec for the workstation, second draft
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: Tech Spec, System Installer
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: Tech Spec, System Installer
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: Tech Spec, System Installer
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Tech Spec, System Installer
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: Gnome Classic [Was: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product]
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Gnome Classic [Was: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product]
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- Re: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: technical spec for the workstation up for review
- technical spec for the workstation up for review
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- Re: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- GNOME 3.12 In Fedora 20 or COPR: Call for volunteers
- Re: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- Re: So are we skipping a gnome release?
- Re: So are we skipping a gnome release?
- Re: So are we skipping a gnome release?
- Re: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- Re: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- Re: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- Re: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- Re: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- Re: [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- [Proposal for vote] GNOME as default base of the Workstation Product
- Re: Drop nm-connection-editor?
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Re: Drop nm-connection-editor?
- Re: Drop nm-connection-editor?
- Re: Drop nm-connection-editor?
- Re: Drop nm-connection-editor?
- Re: Drop nm-connection-editor?
- Re: Drop nm-connection-editor?
- Re: Drop nm-connection-editor?
- Re: Drop nm-connection-editor?
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: Drop nm-connection-editor?
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: Drop nm-connection-editor?
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: Drop nm-connection-editor?
- Re: Drop nm-connection-editor?
- Re: Question for the WG (and SIG) -- do you want to keep "Workstation"?
- Re: Question for the WG (and SIG) -- do you want to keep "Workstation"?
- Re: Question for the WG (and SIG) -- do you want to keep "Workstation"?
- Re: Question for the WG (and SIG) -- do you want to keep "Workstation"?
- Re: Question for the WG (and SIG) -- do you want to keep "Workstation"?
- Re: Question for the WG (and SIG) -- do you want to keep "Workstation"?
- Re: The vision for the Fedora Workstation
- Re: Question for the WG (and SIG) -- do you want to keep "Workstation"?
- Re: Question for the WG (and SIG) -- do you want to keep "Workstation"?
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: Question for the WG (and SIG) -- do you want to keep "Workstation"?
- Re: Question for the WG (and SIG) -- do you want to keep "Workstation"?
- Re: Question for the WG (and SIG) -- do you want to keep "Workstation"?
- Re: Question for the WG (and SIG) -- do you want to keep "Workstation"?
[Index of Archives]
[Fedora KDE]
[Kernel Announce]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]