On 02/05/2025 03:39, Tony Ambardar wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I ran into the following running the latest pahole tests:
>
> $ vmlinux=~/linux/vmlinux ./tests/tests
> 1: Validation of BTF encoding of functions; this may take some time: Ok
> 2: Default BTF on a system without BTF: Ok
> 3: Flexible arrays accounting: pahole: type 'bpf_empty_prog_array' not found
> pahole: type 'kstatmount' not found
> pahole: type 'crypto_lskcipher' not found
> pahole: type 'crypto_sig' not found
> pahole: type 'hash_ctx' not found
> pahole: type 'scsi_stream_status_header' not found
> pahole: type 'virtnet_info' not found
> pahole: type 'geneve_dev' not found
> pahole: type 'geneve_config' not found
> pahole: type 'lirc_fh' not found
> pahole: type 'scmi_registered_events_desc' not found
> pahole: type 'events_queue' not found
> pahole: type 'hid_debug_list' not found
> pahole: type 'flow_offload_action' not found
> pahole: type 'nft_rule_dp_last' not found
> pahole: type 'nft_rhash_elem' not found
> pahole: type 'nft_hash_elem' not found
> pahole: type 'nft_bitmap_elem' not found
> pahole: type 'nft_rbtree_elem' not found
> pahole: type 'nft_pipapo_elem' not found
> pahole: type 'xt_standard_target' not found
> pahole: type 'xt_error_target' not found
> pahole: type 'ipt_standard' not found
> pahole: type 'ipt_error' not found
> pahole: type 'ip6t_standard' not found
> pahole: type 'ip6t_error' not found
>
> This is simple to reproduce (e.g. code in flexible_arrays.sh):
>
> $ pahole kstatmount ~/linux/vmlinux
> pahole: type 'kstatmount' not found
>
> But despite the above:
>
> $ bpftool btf dump file ~/linux/vmlinux format raw|grep kstatmount
> [13145] STRUCT 'kstatmount' size=624 vlen=8
>
> And:
>
> $ pahole -C kstatmount ~/linux/vmlinux
> struct kstatmount {
> struct statmount * buf; /* 0 4 */
> ...
> };
>
> Has this been seen before? Am I missing something? Any insight folks have
> would be appreciated.
>
> The same behaviour is also seen with '.tmp_vmlinux1.btf.o', which I attach.
>
> Many thanks,
> Tony Ambardar
hi Tony, I've seen this too (with a slightly different cast of
characters); I keep meaning to look into it but haven't had a chance yet
so thanks for doing some investigation! Seems like it is a bug in type
display rather than in BTF generation at least..
Alan
