Not sure if there is much of a point in second guessing the compiler with the explicit inline statement (t'll probably inline anyway), but the logic change looks good: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Not sure if there is much of a point in second guessing the compiler with the explicit inline statement (t'll probably inline anyway), but the logic change looks good: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
![]() |