Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] block: WARN if bdev inflight counter is negative

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27/04/2025 09:29, Yu Kuai wrote:
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>

Which means there is a BUG

nit: to me, BUG means symbol BUG(), and not a software bug (which I think that you mean)

for related bio-based disk driver, or blk-mq
for rq-based disk, it's better not to hide the BUG.

AFICS, this check was not present for mq, so is it really required now? I suppose that the code is simpler to always have the check. I find it an odd check to begin with...


Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  block/genhd.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
index f671d9ee00c4..d158c25237b6 100644
--- a/block/genhd.c
+++ b/block/genhd.c
@@ -136,9 +136,9 @@ static void part_in_flight_rw(struct block_device *part,
  		inflight[0] += part_stat_local_read_cpu(part, in_flight[0], cpu);
  		inflight[1] += part_stat_local_read_cpu(part, in_flight[1], cpu);
  	}
-	if ((int)inflight[0] < 0)
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE((int)inflight[0] < 0))
  		inflight[0] = 0;
-	if ((int)inflight[1] < 0)
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE((int)inflight[1] < 0))
  		inflight[1] = 0;
  }





[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux