Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Multipath bio vs. request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Multipath bio vs. request
From: Mike Christie <michael.christie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 21:59:29 -0500
Cc: Samuel Petrovic <spetrovi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <6fc92ed7-5656-4cef-9f36-fd2d37e56e12@redhat.com>
References: <6fc92ed7-5656-4cef-9f36-fd2d37e56e12@redhat.com>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 3/22/25 1:38 PM, John Meneghini wrote:
> [4] https://people.redhat.com/jmeneghi/LSFMM_2025/DMMP_BIOvsRequest/

For the tests run in the link, what did you use for dm_mq_nr_hw_queues
and dm_mq_queue_depth?

References:
- [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Multipath bio vs. request
  - From: John Meneghini

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH V3 0/5] loop: improve loop aio perf by IOCB_NOWAIT
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] the dm-loop target
Previous by thread: Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Multipath bio vs. request
Next by thread: [PATCH 0/3] fix issue of multipathd not tracking device
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [DM Crypt] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Packaging] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite Discussion] [KDE Users] [Fedora Docs]

Powered by Linux