Re: Optimal number of placement groups per OSD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Den tors 1 maj 2025 kl 09:12 skrev gagan tiwari
<gagan.tiwari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> HI Janne,
>                      Thanks for the explanation.
>
> So, using all 10X15 Disks on 7 OSD nodes. Number PG will be :-
>
> ( 10X7X100 ) / 6 =  1166.666  nearest power of 2 is 2028.
>
> So, I will need to set 2028 placement groups. With 2028 PG , three will be 12,168 pieces to be spread out on 70
> OSDs, which will give me 173.82  per OSD.  Will this be an optimal number ? Or this should be rounded off to 174

You could still start with 1024, it will not hurt a lot to have 80 PGs
per OSD and you can split again later (which one does after expanding
clusters anyhow) but then again, with ssd/nvme, being closer to 200
PGs per OSD is probably better to utilize the flash drives better. Go
with 2048.

-- 
May the most significant bit of your life be positive.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux