Thank you. The only thing I’m unclear on is the rollback to pacific.
Are you referring to
https://docs.ceph.com/en/quincy/cephadm/troubleshooting/#manually-deploying-a-manager-daemon
Thank you. I appreciate all the help. Should I wait for Adam to comment? At the moment, the cluster is functioning enough to maintain running vms, so if it’s wise to wait, I can do that.
-jeremy
On Monday, Apr 07, 2025 at 12:23 AM, Eugen Block <eblock@xxxxxx> wrote:I haven't tried it this way yet, and I had hoped that Adam would chime
in, but my approach would be to remove this key (it's not present when
no upgrade is in progress):
ceph config-key rm mgr/cephadm/upgrade_state
Then rollback the two newer MGRs to Pacific as described before. If
they come up healthy, test if the orchestrator works properly first.
For example, remove a node-exporter or crash or anything else
uncritical and let it redeploy.
If that works, try a staggered upgrade, starting with the MGRs only:
ceph orch upgrade start --image <image-name> --daemon-types mgr
Since there's no need to go to Quincy, I suggest to upgrade to Reef
18.2.4 (or you wait until 18.2.5 is released, which should be very
soon), so set the respective <image-name> in the above command.
If all three MGRs successfully upgrade, you can continue with the
MONs, or with the entire rest.
In production clusters, I usually do staggered upgrades, e. g. I limit
the number of OSD daemons first just to see if they come up healthy,
then I let it upgrade all other OSDs automatically.
https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/cephadm/upgrade/#staggered-upgrade
Zitat von Jeremy Hansen <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>:
Snipped some of the irrelevant logs to keep message size down.
ceph config-key get mgr/cephadm/upgrade_state
{"target_name": "quay.io/ceph/ceph:v17.2.0", "progress_id":
"e7e1a809-558d-43a7-842a-c6229fdc57af", "target_id":
"e1d6a67b021eb077ee22bf650f1a9fb1980a2cf5c36bdb9cba9eac6de8f702d9",
"target_digests":
["quay.io/ceph/ceph@sha256:12a0a4f43413fd97a14a3d47a3451b2d2df50020835bb93db666209f3f77617a", "quay.io/ceph/ceph@sha256:cb4d698cb769b6aba05bf6ef04f41a7fe694160140347576e13bd9348514b667"], "target_version": "17.2.0", "fs_original_max_mds": null, "fs_original_allow_standby_replay": null, "error": null, "paused": false, "daemon_types": null, "hosts": null, "services": null, "total_count": null, "remaining_count":
null}
What should I do next?
Thank you!
-jeremy
On Sunday, Apr 06, 2025 at 1:38 AM, Eugen Block <eblock@xxxxxx
(mailto:eblock@xxxxxx)> wrote:
Can you check if you have this config-key?
ceph config-key get mgr/cephadm/upgrade_state
If you reset the MGRs, it might be necessary to clear this key,
otherwise you might end up in some inconsistency. Just to be sure.
Zitat von Jeremy Hansen <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>:
Thanks. I’m trying to be extra careful since this cluster ishttps://lists.ceph.io/hyperkitty/list/ceph-users@xxxxxxx/message/32APKOXKRAIZ7IDCNI25KVYFCCCF6RJG/
actually in use. I’ll wait for your feedback.
-jeremy
On Saturday, Apr 05, 2025 at 3:39 PM, Eugen Block <eblock@xxxxxx
(mailto:eblock@xxxxxx)> wrote:
No, that's not necessary, just edit the unit.run file for the MGRs to
use a different image. See Frédéric's instructions:
https://docs.ceph.com/en/quincy/cephadm/troubleshooting/#manually-deploying-a-manager-daemon
But I'm not entirely sure if you need to clear some config-keys first
in order to reset the upgrade state. If I have time, I'll try to check
tomorrow, or on Monday.
Zitat von Jeremy Hansen <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx>:
Would I follow this process to downgrade?
Anyway, these two
Thank you
On Saturday, Apr 05, 2025 at 2:04 PM, Jeremy Hansen
<jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx (mailto:jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx)> wrote:
ceph -s claims things are healthy:
ceph -s
cluster:
id: 95f49c1c-b1e8-11ee-b5d0-0cc47a8f35c1
health: HEALTH_OK
services:
mon: 3 daemons, quorum cn01,cn03,cn02 (age 20h)
mgr: cn03.negzvb(active, since 26m), standbys: cn01.tjmtph,
cn02.ceph.xyz.corp.ggixgj
mds: 1/1 daemons up, 2 standby
osd: 15 osds: 15 up (since 19h), 15 in (since 14M)
data:
volumes: 1/1 healthy
pools: 6 pools, 610 pgs
objects: 284.59k objects, 1.1 TiB
usage: 3.3 TiB used, 106 TiB / 109 TiB avail
pgs: 610 active+clean
io:
client: 255 B/s rd, 1.2 MiB/s wr, 10 op/s rd, 16 op/s wr
—
How do I downgrade if the orch is down?
Thank you
-jeremy
On Saturday, Apr 05, 2025 at 1:56 PM, Eugen Block <eblock@xxxxxx(mailto:eblock@xxxxxx)> wrote:It would help if you only pasted the relevant parts.[balancer INFO root]sections stand out:
---snip---
Apr 05 20:33:48 cn03.ceph.xyz.corp
ceph-95f49c1c-b1e8-11ee-b5d0-0cc47a8f35c1-mgr-cn03-negzvb[307291]:
debug 2025-04-05T20:33:48.909+0000 7f26f0200700 0load Failed toSome PGs (1.000000) are unknown; try again later
Apr 05 20:33:48 cn03.ceph.xyz.corp
ceph-95f49c1c-b1e8-11ee-b5d0-0cc47a8f35c1-mgr-cn03-negzvb[307291]:
debug 2025-04-05T20:33:48.917+0000 7f2663400700 -1 mgrload Tracebackconstruct class in 'cephadm'
Apr 05 20:33:48 cn03.ceph.xyz.corp
ceph-95f49c1c-b1e8-11ee-b5d0-0cc47a8f35c1-mgr-cn03-negzvb[307291]:
debug 2025-04-05T20:33:48.917+0000 7f2663400700 -1 mgrin __init__(most recent call last):
Apr 05 20:33:48 cn03.ceph.xyz.corp
ceph-95f49c1c-b1e8-11ee-b5d0-0cc47a8f35c1-mgr-cn03-negzvb[307291]:
File "/usr/share/ceph/mgr/cephadm/module.py", line 470,in __init__Apr 05 20:33:48 cn03.ceph.xyz.corp
ceph-95f49c1c-b1e8-11ee-b5d0-0cc47a8f35c1-mgr-cn03-negzvb[307291]:
self.upgrade = CephadmUpgrade(self)
Apr 05 20:33:48 cn03.ceph.xyz.corp
ceph-95f49c1c-b1e8-11ee-b5d0-0cc47a8f35c1-mgr-cn03-negzvb[307291]:
File "/usr/share/ceph/mgr/cephadm/upgrade.py", line 112,in from_jsonApr 05 20:33:48 cn03.ceph.xyz.corp
ceph-95f49c1c-b1e8-11ee-b5d0-0cc47a8f35c1-mgr-cn03-negzvb[307291]:
self.upgrade_state: Optional[UpgradeState] =
UpgradeState.from_json(json.loads(t))
Apr 05 20:33:48 cn03.ceph.xyz.corp
ceph-95f49c1c-b1e8-11ee-b5d0-0cc47a8f35c1-mgr-cn03-negzvb[307291]:
File "/usr/share/ceph/mgr/cephadm/upgrade.py", line 93,load Failed to'daemon_types'Apr 05 20:33:48 cn03.ceph.xyz.corp
ceph-95f49c1c-b1e8-11ee-b5d0-0cc47a8f35c1-mgr-cn03-negzvb[307291]:
return cls(**c)
Apr 05 20:33:48 cn03.ceph.xyz.corp
ceph-95f49c1c-b1e8-11ee-b5d0-0cc47a8f35c1-mgr-cn03-negzvb[307291]:
TypeError: __init__() got an unexpected keyword argumentApr 05 20:33:48 cn03.ceph.xyz.corp
ceph-95f49c1c-b1e8-11ee-b5d0-0cc47a8f35c1-mgr-cn03-negzvb[307291]:
Apr 05 20:33:48 cn03.ceph.xyz.corp
ceph-95f49c1c-b1e8-11ee-b5d0-0cc47a8f35c1-mgr-cn03-negzvb[307291]:
debug 2025-04-05T20:33:48.918+0000 7f2663400700 -1 mgr operator()
Failed to run module in active mode ('cephadm')
Apr 05 20:33:49 cn03.ceph.xyz.corp
ceph-95f49c1c-b1e8-11ee-b5d0-0cc47a8f35c1-mgr-cn03-negzvb[307291]:
debug 2025-04-05T20:33:49.273+0000 7f2663400700 -1 mgrload Tracebackconstruct class in 'snap_schedule'
Apr 05 20:33:49 cn03.ceph.xyz.corp
ceph-95f49c1c-b1e8-11ee-b5d0-0cc47a8f35c1-mgr-cn03-negzvb[307291]:
debug 2025-04-05T20:33:49.273+0000 7f2663400700 -1 mgr"/usr/share/ceph/mgr/snap_schedule/fs/schedule_client.py", linein __init__(most recent call last):
Apr 05 20:33:49 cn03.ceph.xyz.corp
ceph-95f49c1c-b1e8-11ee-b5d0-0cc47a8f35c1-mgr-cn03-negzvb[307291]:
File "/usr/share/ceph/mgr/snap_schedule/module.py", line 38,Apr 05 20:33:49 cn03.ceph.xyz.corp
ceph-95f49c1c-b1e8-11ee-b5d0-0cc47a8f35c1-mgr-cn03-negzvb[307291]:
self.client = SnapSchedClient(self)
Apr 05 20:33:49 cn03.ceph.xyz.corp
ceph-95f49c1c-b1e8-11ee-b5d0-0cc47a8f35c1-mgr-cn03-negzvb[307291]:
File"/usr/share/ceph/mgr/snap_schedule/fs/schedule_client.py", line158, in __init__
Apr 05 20:33:49 cn03.ceph.xyz.corp
ceph-95f49c1c-b1e8-11ee-b5d0-0cc47a8f35c1-mgr-cn03-negzvb[307291]:
with self.get_schedule_db(fs_name) as conn_mgr:
Apr 05 20:33:49 cn03.ceph.xyz.corp
ceph-95f49c1c-b1e8-11ee-b5d0-0cc47a8f35c1-mgr-cn03-negzvb[307291]:
Filecome from the192, in get_schedule_db
Apr 05 20:33:49 cn03.ceph.xyz.corp
ceph-95f49c1c-b1e8-11ee-b5d0-0cc47a8f35c1-mgr-cn03-negzvb[307291]:
db.executescript(dump)
Apr 05 20:33:49 cn03.ceph.xyz.corp
ceph-95f49c1c-b1e8-11ee-b5d0-0cc47a8f35c1-mgr-cn03-negzvb[307291]:
sqlite3.OperationalError: table schedules already exists
Apr 05 20:33:49 cn03.ceph.xyz.corp
ceph-95f49c1c-b1e8-11ee-b5d0-0cc47a8f35c1-mgr-cn03-negzvb[307291]:
Apr 05 20:33:49 cn03.ceph.xyz.corp
ceph-95f49c1c-b1e8-11ee-b5d0-0cc47a8f35c1-mgr-cn03-negzvb[307291]:
debug 2025-04-05T20:33:49.274+0000 7f2663400700 -1 mgr operator()
Failed to run module in active mode ('snap_schedule')
---snip---
Your cluster seems to be in an error state (ceph -s) because of an
unknown PG. It's recommended to have a healthy cluster before
attemping an upgrade. It's possible that these errorsan upgrade tonot upgraded MGR, I'm not sure.
Since the upgrade was only successful for two MGRs, I am thinking
about downgrading both MGRs back to 16.2.15, then retrythat already.a newer version, either 17.2.8 or 18.2.4. I haven't checked the
snap_schedule error yet, though. Maybe someone else knows
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx