Re: Reef: highly-available NFS with keepalive_only

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 3/25/25 um 18:55 schrieb Eugen Block:
Okay, so I don't see anything in the keepalive log about communicating between each other. The config files are almost identical, no difference in priority, but in unicast_peer. ceph03 has no entry at all for unicast_peer, ceph02 has only ceph03 in there while ceph01 has both of the others in its unicast_peer entry. That's weird, isn't it?

They should each have the other two as unicast_peers.
There must have been a glitch in the service generation. Maybe you should try to remove it and deploy it as new?

Regards
--
Robert Sander
Linux Consultant

Heinlein Consulting GmbH
Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin

https://www.heinlein-support.de

Tel: +49 30 405051 - 0
Fax: +49 30 405051 - 19

Amtsgericht Berlin-Charlottenburg - HRB 220009 B
Geschäftsführer: Peer Heinlein - Sitz: Berlin
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux