On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 7:26 PM Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 12:24:08PM +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote: > > > - if (con->v2.hmac_tfm) { > > > - crypto_free_shash(con->v2.hmac_tfm); > > > - con->v2.hmac_tfm = NULL; > > > - } > > > + memzero_explicit(&con->v2.hmac_key, sizeof(con->v2.hmac_key)); > > > + con->v2.hmac_key_set = false; > > > > Hi Eric, > > > > Since we have hmac_key_set anyway, could the call to memzero_explicit() > > be conditioned on it? > > If you want. It's less code to just do it unconditionally. Double checking the surrounding code, the only case where hmac_key_set would remain false is auth_none protocol (i.e. no authentication at the Ceph level at all). This is extremely rare, so I'm leaving the patch as is. Thanks, Ilya