On Mon, 2025-08-11 at 17:05 +0000, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote: > On Wed, 2025-08-06 at 11:48 +0200, Max Kellermann wrote: > > These patches reduce reloads of con->out_msg by passing pointers that > > we already have in local variables (i.e. registers) as parameters. > > > > Access to con->out_queue is now gone completely from v1/v2 and only > > few references to con->out_msg remain. In the long run, I'd like to > > get rid of con->out_msg completely and instead send the whole > > con->out_queue in one kernel_sendmsg() call. This patch series helps > > with preparing that. > > > > Max Kellermann (3): > > net/ceph/messenger: ceph_con_get_out_msg() returns the message pointer > > net/ceph/messenger_v[12]: pass ceph_msg* instead of loading > > con->out_msg > > net/ceph/messenger: add empty check to ceph_con_get_out_msg() > > > > include/linux/ceph/messenger.h | 6 +- > > net/ceph/messenger.c | 12 +-- > > net/ceph/messenger_v1.c | 59 ++++++------ > > net/ceph/messenger_v2.c | 160 ++++++++++++++++----------------- > > 4 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-) > > Unexpectedly, I can see xfstests failures with applied patchset: > > Failures: generic/633 generic/644 generic/645 generic/689 generic/696 > generic/697 > Failed 6 of 610 tests > > I will repeat xfestests run with and without patchset. Maybe, it is the glitch > on my side. > > I double checked the xfstests run. Everything works well. It was glitch on my side. Thanks, Slava.
