Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] s390/bpf: Write back tail call counter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 14:06:27 +0200 you wrote:
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250812141217.144551-1-iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> v1 -> v2: Write back tail call counter only for BPF_PSEUDO_CALL
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This series fixes the tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy test failures on s390.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v2,1/4] s390/bpf: Do not write tail call counter into helper and kfunc frames
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/eada40e057fc
  - [bpf-next,v2,2/4] s390/bpf: Write back tail call counter for BPF_PSEUDO_CALL
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/c861a6b14713
  - [bpf-next,v2,3/4] s390/bpf: Write back tail call counter for BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/bc3905a71f02
  - [bpf-next,v2,4/4] selftests/bpf: Clobber a lot of registers in tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy tests
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/12741630350c

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux