On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 06:10:07PM +0800, Pu Lehui wrote:
>
>
> On 2025/8/20 17:26, Chenghao Duan wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 02:52:01PM +0800, Pu Lehui wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2025/8/20 14:25, Chenghao Duan wrote:
> > > > In __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(), retval_off is only meaningful when
> > > > save_ret is true, so the current logic is correct. However, in the
> > >
> > > lgtm, and same for `ip_off`, pls patch it together.
> >
> > I also checked at the time that ip_off is only initialized and assigned
> > when flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_IP_ARG is true. However, I noticed that the use
> > of ip_off also requires this condition, so the compiler did not issue a
> > warning.
> >
> > Chenghao
> >
> > >
> > > > original logic, retval_off is only initialized under certain
>
> Can you show how to replay this warning? I guess the warning path is as
> follow. Compiler didn't know fmod_ret prog need BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG.
>
> ```
> if (fmod_ret->nr_links) {
> ...
> emit_sd(RV_REG_FP, -retval_off, RV_REG_ZERO, ctx);
> }
> ```
>
Exactly, the compiler sees the unconditional use of retval_off.
Chenghao
> > > > conditions, which may cause a build warning.
> > > >
> > > > So initialize retval_off unconditionally to fix it.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Chenghao Duan <duanchenghao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 5 ++---
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> > > > index 10e01ff06312..49bbda8372b0 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> > > > @@ -1079,10 +1079,9 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
> > > > stack_size += 16;
> > > > save_ret = flags & (BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG | BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET);
> > > > - if (save_ret) {
> > > > + if (save_ret)
> > > > stack_size += 16; /* Save both A5 (BPF R0) and A0 */
> > > > - retval_off = stack_size;
> > > > - }
> > > > + retval_off = stack_size;
> > > > stack_size += nr_arg_slots * 8;
> > > > args_off = stack_size;
