Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] bpf: improve the general precision of tnum_mul

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] bpf: improve the general precision of tnum_mul
From: Nandakumar Edamana <nandakumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 16:01:28 +0530
In-reply-to: <0ba41cd7-adc0-4c65-b1e0-defd8ebc2d64@nandakumar.co.in>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

Sorry, my reply to Harishankar got detached from this thread due to anemail misconfiguration from my part. Copying the archive link here forfuture reference:https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/c1296815-67f5-4f31-99fe-b9a86bb7a117@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u


--
Nandakumar Edamana

References:
- Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] bpf: improve the general precision of tnum_mul
  - From: Eduard Zingerman
- Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] bpf: improve the general precision of tnum_mul
  - From: Harishankar Vishwanathan

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH dwarves v2] btf_encoder: group all function ELF syms by function name
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] riscv: bpf: Fix uninitialized symbol 'retval_off'
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] bpf: improve the general precision of tnum_mul
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] bpf: improve the general precision of tnum_mul
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux