Re: [PATCH 1/2] bpf: improve the general precision of tnum_mul
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Subject
: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bpf: improve the general precision of tnum_mul
From
: Nandakumar Edamana <nandakumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 22:37:46 +0530
Cc
: bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Harishankar Vishwanathan <harishankar.vishwanathan@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to
: <
20250822170407.2053504-1-nandakumar@nandakumar.co.in
>
User-agent
: Mozilla Thunderbird
Sent with an incorrect subject line. Please ignore. -- Nandakumar Edamana
References
:
[PATCH 1/2] bpf: improve the general precision of tnum_mul
From:
Nandakumar Edamana
Prev by Date:
Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Use sha1() instead of sha1_transform() in bpf_prog_calc_tag()
Next by Date:
[PATCH 2/2] bpf: add selftest to check the verifier's abstract multiplication
Previous by thread:
[PATCH 1/2] bpf: improve the general precision of tnum_mul
Next by thread:
[PATCH 2/2] bpf: add selftest to check the verifier's abstract multiplication
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Samsung SoC]
[Linux Rockchip SoC]
[Linux Actions SoC]
[Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]
[Linux NFS]
[Linux NILFS]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
