Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: improve the general precision of tnum_mul

[Nandakumar Edamana <nandakumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Status as of now:

DECIDED:

1. Replace the current outer comment for the new tnum_mul() with a
   cleaner explanation and the example from the README of the test
   program.

2. (Related to PATCH 2/2) Drop the trivial tests.

UNDECIDED:

Instead of just doing tnum_mul(a, b),

a) whether to do best(tnum_mul(a, b), tnum_mul(b, a))
b) whether to do best(best(tnum_mul(a, b), tnum_mul(b, a)),
                      best(tnum_mul_old(a, b), tnum_mul_old(b, a)))

--
Nandakumar