Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/9] xsk: improvement performance in copy mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/9] xsk: improvement performance in copy mode
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 10:44:37 -0700
Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx, pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx, bjorn@xxxxxxxxxx, magnus.karlsson@xxxxxxxxx, maciej.fijalkowski@xxxxxxxxx, jonathan.lemon@xxxxxxxxx, sdf@xxxxxxxxxxx, ast@xxxxxxxxxx, daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, hawk@xxxxxxxxxx, john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx, horms@xxxxxxxxxx, andrew+netdev@xxxxxxx, bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jason Xing <kernelxing@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20250825135342.53110-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>

On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 21:53:33 +0800 Jason Xing wrote:
> copy mode:   1,109,754 pps
> batch mode:  2,393,498 pps (+115.6%)
> xmit.more:   3,024,110 pps (+172.5%)
> zc mode:    14,879,414 pps

I've asked you multiple times to add comparison with the performance 
of AF_PACKET. What's the disconnect?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/9] xsk: improvement performance in copy mode
  - From: Jason Xing

References:
- [PATCH net-next v2 0/9] xsk: improvement performance in copy mode
  - From: Jason Xing

Prev by Date: [PATCH v15 4/8] perf: Support deferred user callchains for per CPU events
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 13/14] sched: psi: implement bpf_psi_create_trigger() kfunc
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/9] xsk: improvement performance in copy mode
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/9] xsk: improvement performance in copy mode
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux