Re: [PATCH v6 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Improve the general precision of tnum_mul

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 09:15:23 +0530 you wrote:
> Drop the value-mask decomposition technique and adopt straightforward
> long-multiplication with a twist: when LSB(a) is uncertain, find the
> two partial products (for LSB(a) = known 0 and LSB(a) = known 1) and
> take a union.
> 
> Experiment shows that applying this technique in long multiplication
> improves the precision in a significant number of cases (at the cost
> of losing precision in a relatively lower number of cases).
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v6,bpf-next,1/2] bpf: Improve the general precision of tnum_mul
    (no matching commit)
  - [v6,bpf-next,2/2] bpf: Add selftest to check the verifier's abstract multiplication
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/2660b9d47750

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux