The current implementation seems incorrect and does NOT match the
comment above, use bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize() instead.
Fixes: 1dad391daef1 ("bpf, arm64: use bpf_prog_pack for memory management")
Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 52ffe115a8c4..4ef9b7b8fb40 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -3064,8 +3064,7 @@ void bpf_jit_free(struct bpf_prog *prog)
* before freeing it.
*/
if (jit_data) {
- bpf_arch_text_copy(&jit_data->ro_header->size, &jit_data->header->size,
- sizeof(jit_data->header->size));
+ bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize(jit_data->ro_header, jit_data->header);
kfree(jit_data);
}
prog->bpf_func -= cfi_get_offset();
--
2.27.0
