On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 3:19 PM Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 6:17 PM Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 5:37 PM KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 11:02 PM Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > It's nice to see a v3 revision, but it would be good to see some > > > > comments on Blaise's reply to your v2 revision. From what I can see > > > > it should enable the different use cases and requirements that have > > > > been posted. > > > > > > I will defer to Alexei and others here (mostly due to time crunch). It > > > would however be useful to explain the use-cases in which signed maps > > > are useful (beyond being a different approach than the current > > > delegated verification). > > I wanted to bring this up again as it has been another week with no > comment from the BPF side of the house regarding Blaise's additions. > As a reminder, Blaise's patch can be found here: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module/87sei58vy3.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Another gentle ping. I realize everyone is busy, and August is a popular month for holidays, but it has been a month since Blaise posted his patch/snippet; it would be nice to get some feedback on the basic idea. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module/87sei58vy3.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- paul-moore.com
