Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 3/3] bpf: fix stackmap overflow check in __bpf_get_stackid()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 09/09/2025 17:41, Song Liu wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 9:48 AM Arnaud lecomte <contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Arnaud Lecomte <contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Syzkaller reported a KASAN slab-out-of-bounds write in __bpf_get_stackid()
when copying stack trace data. The issue occurs when the perf trace
  contains more stack entries than the stack map bucket can hold,
  leading to an out-of-bounds write in the bucket's data array.

Reported-by: syzbot+c9b724fbb41cf2538b7b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=c9b724fbb41cf2538b7b
Fixes: ee2a098851bf ("bpf: Adjust BPF stack helper functions to accommodate skip > 0")
Signed-off-by: Arnaud Lecomte <contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>

With one nitpick below.

[...]
@@ -390,15 +391,16 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid_pe, struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern *, ctx,
                 return -EFAULT;

         nr_kernel = count_kernel_ip(trace);
+       elem_size = stack_map_data_size(map);
+       __u64 nr = trace->nr; /* save original */
nit: I think all variable declarations should go to the beginning of
the {} block.
I am surprised ./scripts/checkpatch.pl doesn't complain this.

Good catch, thanks !
I should maybe wait for comments from other reviewers because raising
an other revision.
         if (kernel) {
-               __u64 nr = trace->nr;
-
[...]

Thanks,
Arnaud





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux