RE: [PATCH v17 net-next 12/14] tcp: accecn: AccECN option failure handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx> 
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2025 12:36 PM
> To: Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia) <chia-yu.chang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; corbet@xxxxxxx; horms@xxxxxxxxxx; dsahern@xxxxxxxxxx; kuniyu@xxxxxxxxxx; bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dave.taht@xxxxxxxxx; jhs@xxxxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx; stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx; jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx; davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; andrew+netdev@xxxxxxx; donald.hunter@xxxxxxxxx; ast@xxxxxxxxxxx; liuhangbin@xxxxxxxxx; shuah@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ij@xxxxxxxxxx; ncardwell@xxxxxxxxxx; Koen De Schepper (Nokia) <koen.de_schepper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; g.white@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; ingemar.s.johansson@xxxxxxxxxxxx; mirja.kuehlewind@xxxxxxxxxxxx; cheshire@xxxxxxxxx; rs.ietf@xxxxxx; Jason_Livingood@xxxxxxxxxxx; vidhi_goel@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 net-next 12/14] tcp: accecn: AccECN option failure handling
> 
> 
> CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information.
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 10:34 AM <chia-yu.chang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Chia-Yu Chang <chia-yu.chang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > AccECN option may fail in various way, handle these:
> > - Attempt to negotiate the use of AccECN on the 1st retransmitted SYN
> >         - From the 2nd retransmitted SYN, stop AccECN negotiation
> > - Remove option from SYN/ACK rexmits to handle blackholes
> > - If no option arrives in SYN/ACK, assume Option is not usable
> >         - If an option arrives later, re-enabled
> > - If option is zeroed, disable AccECN option processing
> >
> > This patch use existing padding bits in tcp_request_sock and holes in 
> > tcp_sock without increasing the size.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Chia-Yu Chang <chia-yu.chang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> 
> 
> ...
> 
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/tcp.h b/include/uapi/linux/tcp.h index 
> > 53e0e85b52be..00604b7f2f3f 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/tcp.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/tcp.h
> > @@ -316,6 +316,8 @@ struct tcp_info {
> >                                          * in milliseconds, including any
> >                                          * unfinished recovery.
> >                                          */
> > +       __u16   tcpi_accecn_fail_mode;
> > +       __u16   tcpi_accecn_opt_seen;
> 
> We never add fields in the middle of tcp_info , even in a patch series.
> 
> Some people might miss this rule in the future, by looking at a patch doing this, and repeating the mistake...
> 
> 
> >         __u32   tcpi_received_ce;    /* # of CE marks received */
> >         __u32   tcpi_delivered_e1_bytes;  /* Accurate ECN byte counters */
> >         __u32   tcpi_delivered_e0_bytes;

Thanks Eric.

I will fix this in the next version.

Chia-Yu




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux