On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 8:48 AM Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 11:05:59AM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 1:42 AM Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 04:18:03PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 02:28:22PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > These are cleanups and fixes that I applied on top of Jiri's patches: > > > > > > > > > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250720112133.244369-1-jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > > The combined lot sits in: > > > > > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git perf/core > > > > > > > > > > Jiri was going to send me some selftest updates that might mean rebasing that > > > > > tree, but we'll see. If this all works we'll land it in -tip. > > > > > > > > > > > > > hi, > > > > sent the selftest fix in here: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250821141557.13233-1-jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u > > > > > > Andrii, > > > do we want any special logistic for the bpf/selftest changes or it could > > > go through the tip tree? > > > > let's route selftest changes through tip together with the rest of > > uprobe changes, it's unlikely to conflict > > fyi, there's conflict now between tip/perf/core and bpf-next/master > in the selftests.. due to usdt SIB argument support changes > > please let me know if you need any help in resolving that so selftest change hasn't landed in tip/perf/core just yet, is that right? If there is a conflict, I guess that changes equation a bit. I'd land it in bpf-next and for now disable that test in BPF CI until the trees converge. WDYT? > > jirka
