Re: [RFC bpf-next v1 0/7] Add kfunc bpf_xdp_pull_data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 11:53 AM Amery Hung <ameryhung@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 9:21 AM Nimrod Oren <noren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 05/09/2025 1:16, Amery Hung wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 6:39 AM Nimrod Oren <noren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> I got a crash when testing this series with the xdp_dummy program from
> > >> tools/testing/selftests/net/lib/. Need to make sure we're not breaking
> > >> compatibility for programs that keep the linear part empty.
> > >
> > > ping.py test ran successfully for me. Is this what you tried but
> > > crashed the kernel?
> >
> > Yes, that's odd. Is it possible that the native multibuf case was
> > skipped over because of an older iproute2/libbpf version?
> >
> > If it's helpful, I used iproute2-6.16.0 built with libbpf 1.7.0 support.
> > I am able to reproduce the crash by loading multibuf prog directly with:
> > `ip link set dev eth0 mtu 9000 xdp obj
> > tools/testing/selftests/net/lib/xdp_dummy.bpf.o sec xdp.frags`
>
> I can reproduce it with v2. Will fix it in v3.
>
> The bug is that sinfo->flags is also cleared in build_skb(), so later
> xdp_buff_has_frags() will always return false and no data was ever
> pulled into the linear part.

Correcting myself. It is sinfo->xdp_frags_size being cleared in
xdp_update_skb_shared_info().





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux