Re: [syzbot ci] Re: bpf: replace path-sensitive with path-insensitive live stack analysis

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 3:06 PM Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2025-09-11 at 14:58 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 2:09 PM Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2025-09-10 at 23:57 -0700, syzbot ci wrote:
> > > > syzbot ci has tested the following series
> > > >
> > > > [v1] bpf: replace path-sensitive with path-insensitive live stack analysis
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250911010437.2779173-1-eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx
> > > > * [PATCH bpf-next v1 01/10] bpf: bpf_verifier_state->cleaned flag instead of REG_LIVE_DONE
> > > > * [PATCH bpf-next v1 02/10] bpf: use compute_live_registers() info in clean_func_state
> > > > * [PATCH bpf-next v1 03/10] bpf: remove redundant REG_LIVE_READ check in stacksafe()
> > > > * [PATCH bpf-next v1 04/10] bpf: declare a few utility functions as internal api
> > > > * [PATCH bpf-next v1 05/10] bpf: compute instructions postorder per subprogram
> > > > * [PATCH bpf-next v1 06/10] bpf: callchain sensitive stack liveness tracking using CFG
> > > > * [PATCH bpf-next v1 07/10] bpf: enable callchain sensitive stack liveness tracking
> > > > * [PATCH bpf-next v1 08/10] bpf: signal error if old liveness is more conservative than new
> > > > * [PATCH bpf-next v1 09/10] bpf: disable and remove registers chain based liveness
> > > > * [PATCH bpf-next v1 10/10] bpf: table based bpf_insn_successors()
> > > >
> > > > and found the following issue:
> > > > KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds Write in compute_postorder
> > > >
> > > > Full report is available here:
> > > > https://ci.syzbot.org/series/c42e236b-f40c-4d72-8ae7-da4e21c37e17
> > > >
> > > > ***
> > > >
> > > > KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds Write in compute_postorder
> > > >
> > > > tree:      bpf-next
> > > > URL:       https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git
> > > > base:      e12873ee856ffa6f104869b8ea10c0f741606f13
> > > > arch:      amd64
> > > > compiler:  Debian clang version 20.1.8 (++20250708063551+0c9f909b7976-1~exp1~20250708183702.136), Debian LLD 20.1.8
> > > > config:    https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/6d2bc952-3d65-4bcd-9a84-1207b810a1b5/config
> > > > C repro:   https://ci.syzbot.org/findings/338e6ce4-7207-484f-a508-9b00b3121701/c_repro
> > > > syz repro: https://ci.syzbot.org/findings/338e6ce4-7207-484f-a508-9b00b3121701/syz_repro
> > > >
> > > > ==================================================================
> > > > BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in compute_postorder+0x802/0xcb0 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:17840
> > > > Write of size 4 at addr ffff88801f1d4b98 by task syz.0.17/5991
> > >
> > > The error is caused by the following program:
> > >
> > >   (e5) if r15 (null) 0xffffffff goto pc-1 <---- absence of DISCOVERED/EXPLORED mark here
> >
> > (null) ?
>
> The `code` byte is 0xe5, BPF_OP(0xe5) == 0xe0, which is an invalid
> opcode.  But opcodes are verified after check_cfg()/compute_postorder().

hmm.
resolve_pseudo_ldimm64() -> bpf_opcode_in_insntable()
does it before check_cfg.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux