Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: Reject bpf_timer for PREEMPT_RT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 12/9/25 00:38, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 7:06 PM Alexei Starovoitov
> <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 7:02 PM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> If I respin the patch for the bpf tree, I have to drop the part that
>>> skips the timer_interrupt test case. Should I?
>>
>> of course.
> 
> Leon,
> 
> the fix made it all the way to bpf-next.
> Please follow up to silence timer_interrupt test.
> 
> It shouldn't affect CI, since we don't test RT.

No problem.

Once the fix lands in bpf-next, I’ll test it against RT.

After it’s applied, I’ll follow up with a revert of the patch set in
order to silence the timer_interrupt test.

Thanks,
Leon




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux