On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 11:58 PM Lorenzo Stoakes
<lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 10:44:41AM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote:
> > Currently, THP allocation cannot be restricted to khugepaged alone while
> > being disabled in the page fault path. This limitation exists because
> > disabling THP allocation during page faults also prevents the execution of
> > khugepaged_enter_vma() in that path.
>
> This is quite confusing, I see what you mean - you want to be able to disable
> page fault THP but not khugepaged THP _at the point of possibly faulting in a
> THP aligned VMA_.
>
> It seems this patch makes khugepaged_enter_vma() unconditional for an anonymous
> VMA, rather than depending on the return value specified by
> thp_vma_allowable_order().
The functions thp_vma_allowable_order(TVA_PAGEFAULT) and
thp_vma_allowable_order(TVA_KHUGEPAGED) are functionally equivalent
within the page fault handler; they always yield the same result.
Consequently, their execution order is irrelevant.
The change reorders these two calls and, in doing so, also moves the
call to vmf_anon_prepare(vmf). This alters the control flow:
- before this change: The logic checked the return value of
vmf_anon_prepare() between the two thp_vma_allowable_order() calls.
thp_vma_allowable_order(TVA_PAGEFAULT);
ret = vmf_anon_prepare(vmf);
if (ret)
return ret;
thp_vma_allowable_order(TVA_KHUGEPAGED);
- after this change: The logic now executes both
thp_vma_allowable_order() calls first and does not check the return
value of vmf_anon_prepare().
thp_vma_allowable_order(TVA_KHUGEPAGED);
thp_vma_allowable_order(TVA_PAGEFAULT);
ret = vmf_anon_prepare(vmf); // Return value 'ret' is ignored.
This change is safe because the return value of vmf_anon_prepare() can
be safely ignored. This function checks for transient system-level
conditions (e.g., memory pressure, THP availability) that might
prevent an immediate THP allocation. It does not guarantee that a
subsequent allocation will succeed.
This behavior is consistent with the policy in hugepage_madvise(),
where a VMA is queued for khugepaged before a definitive allocation
check. If the system is under pressure, khugepaged will simply retry
the allocation at a more opportune time.
>
> So I think a clearer explanation is:
>
> khugepaged_enter_vma() ultimately invokes any attached BPF function with
> the TVA_KHUGEPAGED flag set when determining whether or not to enable
> khugepaged THP for a freshly faulted in VMA.
>
> Currently, on fault, we invoke this in do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(), as
> invoked by create_huge_pmd() and only when we have already checked to
> see if an allowable TVA_PAGEFAULT order is specified.
>
> Since we might want to disallow THP on fault-in but allow it via
> khugepaged, we move things around so we always attempt to enter
> khugepaged upon fault.
Thanks for the clarification.
>
> Having said all this, I'm very confused.
>
> Why are we doing this?
>
> We only enable khugepaged _early_ when we know we're faulting in a huge PMD
> here.
>
> I guess we do this because, if we are allowed to do the pagefault, maybe
> something changed that might have previously disallowed khugepaged to run for
> the mm.
>
> But now we're just checking unconditionally for... no reason?
I have blamed the change history of do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page() but
was unable to find any rationale for placing khugepaged_enter_vma()
after the vmf_anon_prepare() check. I therefore believe this ordering
is likely unintentional.
>
> if BPF disables page fault but not khugepaged, then surely the mm would already
> be under be khugepaged if it could be?
The behavior you describe applies to the madvise mode, not the always
mode. To reiterate: the hugepage_madvise() function unconditionally
adds the memory mm to the khugepaged queue, whereas the page fault
handler employs conditional logic.
>
> It's sort of immaterial if we get a pmd_none() that is not-faultable for
> whatever reason but BPF might say is khugepaged'able, because it'd have already
> set this.
>
> This is because if we just map a new VMA, we already let khugepaged have it via
> khugepaged_enter_vma() in __mmap_new_vma() and in the merge paths.
>
> I mean maybe I'm missing something here :)
>
> >
> > With the introduction of BPF, we can now implement THP policies based on
> > different TVA types. This patch adjusts the logic to support this new
> > capability.
> >
> > While we could also extend prtcl() to utilize this new policy, such a
>
> Typo: prtcl -> prctl
thanks
>
> > change would require a uAPI modification.
>
> Hm, in what respect? PR_SET_THP_DISABLE?
Right, when can extend PR_SET_THP_DISABLE() to support this logic as well.
--
Regards
Yafang
