On Sat, Aug 02, 2025 at 11:52:44AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Fri, Aug 01, 2025 at 03:17:42PM +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote: > > From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 15:12:43 +0200 > > > > > From: Kees Cook <kees@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 10:05:47 -0700 > > > > > >> On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 01:37:34PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote: ... > > >> Yeah, this looks like a nice way to express this, and is way more > > >> descriptive than "(u64 *)&xdp->base.frame_sz" :) > > > > > > Sounds good to me! > > > > > > Let me send v4 where I'll fix this. > > > > Note: would it be okay if I send v4 with this fix when the window opens, > > while our validation will retest v3 from Tony's tree in meantine? It's a > > cosmetic change anyway and does not involve any functional changes. > > If this is directed at me, yeah, I don't see any high urgency here. Likewise, I see no urgency.
