Your message had a "Reply-To: <aef2617b-ce03-4830-96a7-39df0c93aaad@xxxxxxxxxx>" header, I ignored it. I believe you meant to have In-Reply-To: instead. 2025-07-23 10:20 UTC+0800 ~ chenyuan_fl@xxxxxxx > From: Yuan Chen <chenyuan@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Adjust symbol matching logic to account for Control-flow Enforcement > Technology (CET) on x86_64 systems. CET prefixes functions with > a 4-byte 'endbr' instruction, shifting the actual hook entry point to > symbol + 4. > > Changed in PATCH v4: > * Refactor repeated code into a function. > * Add detection for the x86 architecture. > > Changed int PATH v5: > * Remove detection for the x86 architecture. > > Signed-off-by: Yuan Chen <chenyuan@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- Looks good from my side, thank you! Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@xxxxxxxxxx> Probably worth waiting for Yonghong's ack as well before merging this patch.
