Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/3] bpftool: Add bpf_token show

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



在 2025/7/22 23:01, Quentin Monnet 写道:
2025-07-22 19:58 UTC+0800 ~ Tao Chen <chen.dylane@xxxxxxxxx>
Add `bpftool token show` command to get token info
from bpffs in /proc/mounts.

Example plain output for `token show`:
token_info  /sys/fs/bpf/token
	allowed_cmds:
	  map_create          prog_load
	allowed_maps:
	allowed_progs:
	  kprobe
	allowed_attachs:
	  xdp
token_info  /sys/fs/bpf/token2
	allowed_cmds:
	  map_create          prog_load
	allowed_maps:
	allowed_progs:
	  kprobe
	allowed_attachs:
	  xdp

Example json output for `token show`:
[{
	"token_info": "/sys/fs/bpf/token",
	"allowed_cmds": ["map_create", "prog_load"],
	"allowed_maps": [],
	"allowed_progs": ["kprobe"],
	"allowed_attachs": ["xdp"]
}, {
	"token_info": "/sys/fs/bpf/token2",
	"allowed_cmds": ["map_create", "prog_load"],
	"allowed_maps": [],
	"allowed_progs": ["kprobe"],
	"allowed_attachs": ["xdp"]
}]

Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@xxxxxxxxx>
---

diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/token.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/token.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f72a116f9c6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/token.c

+static int show_token_info(void)
+{
+	FILE *fp;
+	struct mntent *ent;
+	bool hit = false;
+
+	fp = setmntent(MOUNTS_FILE, "r");
+	if (!fp) {
+		p_err("Failed to open: %s", MOUNTS_FILE);
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	if (json_output)
+		jsonw_start_array(json_wtr);
+
+	while ((ent = getmntent(fp)) != NULL) {
+		if (strncmp(ent->mnt_type, "bpf", 3) == 0) {
+			if (has_delegate_options(ent->mnt_opts)) {
+				__show_token_info(ent);
+				hit = true;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (json_output)
+		jsonw_end_array(json_wtr);
+
+	if (!hit)
+		p_info("Token info not found");

Woops I take this one back. It made sense to have a p_info() message in
your v1 because you were only looking at one bpffs mount point, but now
we list all the ones we find, we should remove this message and silently
ignore mount points without token info (and I think we can remove the
"hit" variable entirely). Sorry! :)


It‘s okay, i will remove it in v3, thanks anyway.

The rest of this patch looks good to me, thank you

Quentin


--
Best Regards
Tao Chen




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux